Return to me

I am finally returning to this strange passion of mine–the world of transit.  In the coming weeks, I intend to post pictures and commentary from recent trips to Chile, New York, San Francisco, and Dallas, where I rode transit and made observations.

Before getting into the specifics of those transit systems and my trips on them, I would make a few general observations, both about those systems and about transit in general.  My perception, backed by some data, suggests that we have something of a paradox in public transportation today.  More people than ever want to use it, and more of it, in their daily lives and for special trips (i.e., high speed rail out of town), but funding lags.  But to me, if a city like Dallas, one of the more sprawling and “transit-unfriendly” I have seen, can add three light rail lines and a commuter rail line to Fort Worth, that says something about the bright future of transit nationally, if not worldwide.  Whether for financial, environmental, moral, logistical, or other reasons, people want alternatives to driving themselves where they want to go.  What’s important is for people to accept the need for upfront investments in public transportation that lead to a tremendous amount of additional value in their cities and states, that put money back into their pockets, time back into their days (in the ideal scenario), and the like.

I’ll say more about all of this later.  For now, here’s a quick update from South Florida, which I visit frequently.  While at first it might not seem so significant that a bus is dropping stops and running express, the report claims that this change in the Miami/Fort Lauderdale area is significant: “The service was launched last January as the first true regional cross-county bus service that allows riders to take a single bus deep into the heart of the adjacent county without having to switch to another bus after they cross the county line.”

And returning to the idea of money in people’s pockets, “”I am looking forward to experiencing a shortened ride to and from the downtown area,” said Marc Cohen of Pembroke Pines. “Even in a gas efficient vehicle, a round trip in and out of Miami will run about $6 in gas. If you want that express lane, add another $4. There is an obvious saving of time, money and gas here. Who can complain?”‘

Beyond taking away reason to complain, my hope is that South Floridians begin thinking more about a reason to switch.  In all my visits to South Florida, it is obvious that much of the region does not lend itself nicely to transit.  You have limited walkability and long stretches of major roadways with lots of traffic signals.  So, to make transit competitive with driving, at least on the basis of how long it takes, is not easy.  I applaud the South Floridian initiative, in this case, to recognize the need to connect the cities of the region and to put in place measures to enhance the riding experience–dedicated lanes, sensors to change traffic lights for buses, etc.  I hope it helps ridership and changes the way South Floridians view transit.



3 responses to “Return to me

  1. Larry, I particularly enjoyed your focus on “to make
    transit competitive with driving, at least on the basis of how long
    it takes…” I was on an express bus down Lamar the other day (101)
    – even without dedicated lanes, the speed was similar to driving,
    and I read and relaxed on the way (versus stress of driving).
    Competing against the car on some carefully selected corridors –
    getting people to/from major (and compact) destinations allows us
    to, as you said, attract some people to make the switch. Looking at
    the trade offs to get there is exactly the topic that should be on
    the table and should be more widely discussed. Thanks for fostering
    that conversation. I look forward to your next post. —

    • Great feedback, Chris. I feel the same way when I have the opportunity to commute via transit–I walk these days, but I’ve definitely experienced the competitive edge transit can have over the car. Thanks.

  2. The forecasted growth of Austin’s population, national media attention surrounding the resiliency and prowess of our local economy, quality of life, climate, and central location all add up to one thing: further congestion. The good part? Already a relatively “smart” city of the US (based on data collected re: education levels, # of degrees, etc.), Austin now competes for talent with some of the country’s major metros due to its overall quality of life. That yields a better-educated, increasingly diverse and progressive local community — who would seemingly embrace the clear virtue of a robust public transit system.

    Rather than combat the growth, it is incumbent upon today’s Austinites to lay down the infrastructure that past generations of Austinites neglected. This pro-activity is the path to preserving our quality of life —- NOT a broad-stroked anti-growth battlecry.

    Austin has the makeup to be a city set apart from the world if we trade the 5-year outlook for the 50-year outlook, and position the community appropriately today.

    Keep it coming Larry

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s